The U.S. Constitution
Archival records, profiles, and educational resources since 1995.

Why the ACLU Started Defending the Second Amendment
For decades, the American Civil Liberties Union was the organization many people associated with unpopular speech, controversial protests, and the principle that constitutional rights do not depend on whether the public approves of the speaker. So it has surprised some observers to see the ACLU...
Read more →
Trump Attacks His Own Supreme Court Picks After Tariff Loss
When presidents pick Supreme Court justices, the political world often talks as if those seats come with a kind of long-term loyalty. This week offered a useful reminder that the Constitution does not work that way. After the Supreme Court struck down most of President Donald Trump’s sweeping...
Read more →
What Is an Arraignment Hearing?
You can feel the whole criminal justice system snap into focus at an arraignment. Until that moment, an arrest can feel like a blur of handcuffs, paperwork, and holding cells. An arraignment, or a closely related first appearance in some courts, is where the state has to say, out loud and on the...
Read more →
What Happens at an Arraignment
For many people, “arraignment” is a word they only hear on TV, usually shouted right before a dramatic plea. In real life, an arraignment is less theatrical and more structural. It is the court’s way of putting the case on the record: who you are, what you are charged with, what your rights...
Read more →
Trump Rebukes His Own Justices After Tariff Loss
When presidents lose at the Supreme Court, they usually complain about the decision . President Donald Trump chose a different target this week: the people , including two justices he personally elevated to the bench. On Sunday, Trump lashed out at Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett after...
Read more →
Clarence Thomas’ Record and the Court’s Balance of Power
There is a particular kind of Supreme Court power that does not show up in oral argument transcripts or in the tally at the bottom of an opinion. It is the power of simply being there, term after term, long enough for your “dissent” to become the next generation’s baseline. Last week, Justice...
Read more →
DOJ Sues Denver Over Its Gun Ban
Denver is about to learn the hard lesson every civics student eventually bumps into: the Constitution does not always care what a city council meant to do. The U.S. Department of Justice has sued Denver over a local gun ban, moving the dispute into federal court. Beyond the politics, the practical...
Read more →
Virginia Supreme Court Voids Democrats’ House Map
Virginia voters said “yes” to a new set of U.S. House districts. The Virginia Supreme Court said that “yes” no longer counts. In a 4-3 decision, the court held that the General Assembly did not follow the Virginia Constitution’s required sequence for putting a redistricting amendment on...
Read more →
Sanctions and “Lawfare”: When Courts Punish Bad-Faith Briefs
Every civics teacher eventually has to say a sentence students hate: process matters . Not because process is pretty, but because it is the guardrail that keeps power from turning into pure muscle. That is why a seemingly small courtroom moment, a federal judge ordering a $5,000 sanction after a...
Read more →
When ICE Arrests the Wrong Person
It is easy to talk about “due process” like it is a courtroom concept. A judge. A lawyer. A formal charge. A tidy timeline. But due process often fails earlier, in the messy place where armed authority meets an ordinary morning. George Retes, a 25-year-old U.S. citizen, Army veteran, and...
Read more →
A New SCOTUS Line on Gerrymanders
Gerrymandering is one of those political practices Americans love to hate, until it helps their side win. But the Constitution does not treat every kind of gerrymander the same. After a recent Supreme Court decision involving Louisiana’s congressional map, that difference just got sharper in a...
Read more →
What Is Dark Money?
Dark money is political money with an identity problem. You can see the ad. You can hear the message. You can sometimes even guess who benefits. But the public cannot reliably see who paid for it , because the true donors are routed through organizations that are not required to disclose them. That...
Read more →
What Is RICO?
“RICO” gets used like a synonym for “big crime.” But the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act is not a vibe. It is a specific federal statute, passed in 1970, that lets prosecutors and civil plaintiffs treat a long-running scheme as the main event. Most criminal law is built...
Read more →
RICO Case Meaning
People throw around the phrase “RICO case” like it is shorthand for big scandal . Someone gets indicted with a stack of charges, the headline says “RICO,” and the public takeaway is basically: this must be serious . It often is. But the meaning of a RICO case is more specific and more...
Read more →
Booker’s Supreme Court Warning
Sen. Cory Booker is making a straightforward midterm argument about the Supreme Court: if Democrats take control of Congress, he says they will “reform” the Court. The question that prompted his remarks was framed as part of a long American tradition of political conflict over the Court,...
Read more →
USPS and Handguns: A Major Rule Change in Motion
For most Americans, “mailing a handgun” sounds like something that is obviously illegal, like putting fireworks in a box and hoping nobody notices. But the law has never been that simple. It has been a layered system of federal statutes, postal regulations, and the background reality that the...
Read more →
NJ Donor Disclosure Fight Shows the Power of Impact Litigation
Constitutional law does not always arrive with a sweeping statute or a landmark opinion that everyone recognizes on sight. Sometimes it starts with something smaller and more procedural: a demand for records. That is the posture of a dispute now unfolding in New Jersey. The state attorney general...
Read more →
Pausing the Carroll Judgment: What an Appeal Freezes and What It Does Not
In civics class, I used to tell my students that the law has two speeds: what the jury decides, and what the system can actually enforce. Those two speeds collide when a losing party asks for a “stay,” meaning a court-ordered pause, while an appeal continues. That is the moment we are in with...
Read more →
New Jersey ruling draws a line on off-duty cannabis use for police
For many Americans, cannabis policy is no longer an abstract debate. It shows up in workplace handbooks, union negotiations, disciplinary hearings, and a simple but important question: what can an employer control once an employee clocks out ? A recent decision from the Superior Court of New...
Read more →
DOJ vs. Colorado Magazine Ban
Colorado has limited ammunition magazines to 15 rounds since 2013. Now the U.S. Department of Justice is in court arguing that Colorado’s “large-capacity magazine” law is not just bad policy, but unconstitutional. That lawsuit tees up a question that sounds simple until you touch the...
Read more →