Logo
U.S. Constitution

The U.S. Constitution

Archival records, profiles, and educational resources since 1995.

Booker’s Supreme Court Warning

Booker’s Supreme Court Warning

Sen. Cory Booker is making a straightforward midterm argument about the Supreme Court: if Democrats take control of Congress, he says they will “reform” the Court. The question that prompted his remarks was framed as part of a long American tradition of political conflict over the Court,...

Read more →
USPS and Handguns: A Major Rule Change in Motion

USPS and Handguns: A Major Rule Change in Motion

For most Americans, “mailing a handgun” sounds like something that is obviously illegal, like putting fireworks in a box and hoping nobody notices. But the law has never been that simple. It has been a layered system of federal statutes, postal regulations, and the background reality that the...

Read more →
NJ Donor Disclosure Fight Shows the Power of Impact Litigation

NJ Donor Disclosure Fight Shows the Power of Impact Litigation

Constitutional law does not always arrive with a sweeping statute or a landmark opinion that everyone recognizes on sight. Sometimes it starts with something smaller and more procedural: a demand for records. That is the posture of a dispute now unfolding in New Jersey. The state attorney general...

Read more →
Pausing the Carroll Judgment: What an Appeal Freezes and What It Does Not

Pausing the Carroll Judgment: What an Appeal Freezes and What It Does Not

In civics class, I used to tell my students that the law has two speeds: what the jury decides, and what the system can actually enforce. Those two speeds collide when a losing party asks for a “stay,” meaning a court-ordered pause, while an appeal continues. That is the moment we are in with...

Read more →
New Jersey ruling draws a line on off-duty cannabis use for police

New Jersey ruling draws a line on off-duty cannabis use for police

For many Americans, cannabis policy is no longer an abstract debate. It shows up in workplace handbooks, union negotiations, disciplinary hearings, and a simple but important question: what can an employer control once an employee clocks out ? A recent decision from the Superior Court of New...

Read more →
DOJ vs. Colorado Magazine Ban

DOJ vs. Colorado Magazine Ban

Colorado has limited ammunition magazines to 15 rounds since 2013. Now the U.S. Department of Justice is in court arguing that Colorado’s “large-capacity magazine” law is not just bad policy, but unconstitutional. That lawsuit tees up a question that sounds simple until you touch the...

Read more →
Roberts, the Court, and the Politics We Pretend Not to See

Roberts, the Court, and the Politics We Pretend Not to See

Chief Justice John Roberts told a room of lawyers at a legal conference in Hershey, Pennsylvania, that many Americans have the Supreme Court wrong. People, he said, see the justices as “political actors.” “I don’t think that is an accurate understanding of what we do,” Roberts added,...

Read more →
11 Supreme Court Cases to Watch This Term

11 Supreme Court Cases to Watch This Term

The Supreme Court’s term does not end with oral argument. It ends with consequences. The Court is now in the final stretch of its 2025–2026 term. Oral arguments are over and the merits docket is fully submitted. What remains is the work that actually settles the law: drafting, finalizing, and...

Read more →
Visa Overstay and Unlawful Presence Explained

Visa Overstay and Unlawful Presence Explained

Most people use the phrase “overstayed my visa” like it is self-explanatory. It sounds like a single mistake with a single punishment. Immigration law does not work that cleanly. In everyday speech, “overstay” often means you stayed longer than you were supposed to. But the legally...

Read more →
National Security Letters Explained

National Security Letters Explained

National Security Letters sound like something a judge signs in a hurry, under dim lights, with a national crisis ticking in the background. They are not that. A National Security Letter, or NSL, is an administrative demand issued by the FBI that compels a company to hand over certain categories of...

Read more →
Removing Federal Judges: The Good Behavior Clause

Removing Federal Judges: The Good Behavior Clause

You will sometimes hear it said that federal judges “can’t be fired.” That is true in the way a bank vault is “unopenable.” It does not open like an ordinary door, but the Constitution includes a mechanism. It is just intentionally difficult. The key phrase is in Article III: judges...

Read more →
Batson Challenges and Peremptory Strikes

Batson Challenges and Peremptory Strikes

Jury selection is one of the few moments in American law where vibes can look like doctrine. In theory, a juror is removed for a clear reason: bias, a conflict of interest, an inability to follow the law. In practice, lawyers also get a limited number of “peremptory strikes,” which allow them...

Read more →
The Anti-Commandeering Doctrine

The Anti-Commandeering Doctrine

Federal law is “the supreme Law of the Land.” That line from the Supremacy Clause gets quoted like it settles every federalism fight on the spot. But supremacy has a boundary that shows up again and again in modern constitutional law: Congress can regulate private actors, but it cannot...

Read more →
Jury Nullification Explained

Jury Nullification Explained

Jury nullification is the legal system’s open secret: a jury can agree the government proved its case, and still refuse to convict. It is not a magic button. It is not a right you can demand. It is a power that shows up as a byproduct of two things the Constitution protects with unusual...

Read more →
Open Primaries vs. Closed Primaries

Open Primaries vs. Closed Primaries

Most Americans learn the basics of elections in one sentence: we vote, someone wins, democracy happens. But nominations are where modern elections are often decided. In a district that reliably leans red or blue, the tightest, most consequential contest is frequently the primary, not the November...

Read more →
Presidential Immunity for Official Acts Explained

Presidential Immunity for Official Acts Explained

“The president is immune.” Three words that sound absolute, monarchical, and a little bit like the end of the rule of law. Except the real doctrine is narrower and more technical than the slogans. The Constitution does not contain a sentence that says the president cannot be sued or the...

Read more →
Diversity Jurisdiction in Federal Court

Diversity Jurisdiction in Federal Court

Most people assume federal courts exist to decide federal questions. Constitutional rights. Federal statutes. Disputes with the United States. But Article III quietly authorizes something else: federal courts can also hear everyday state-law fights when the parties are citizens of different states....

Read more →
Congressional Expulsion Explained

Congressional Expulsion Explained

Congress can investigate you. Congress can subpoena you. Congress can vote to hold you in contempt. But there is one power that feels uniquely severe because it is personal and final: Congress can kick out one of its own. That power is called expulsion , and it is not a criminal conviction. It is...

Read more →
The Federal Vacancies Reform Act Explained

The Federal Vacancies Reform Act Explained

Washington runs on confirmations. But it also runs on vacancies. When a top job requiring Senate confirmation suddenly goes empty, the government cannot just pause. Someone has to sign the orders, approve the spending, supervise the workforce, and answer Congress. The Federal Vacancies Reform Act...

Read more →
Federal Pretrial Diversion and Deferred Prosecution Agreements

Federal Pretrial Diversion and Deferred Prosecution Agreements

Most people assume the federal criminal system has only two gears. You either fight the charge at trial, or you plead guilty and accept the consequences. But there is a quieter third path that shows up in certain federal cases: the government agrees to pause, or even avoid, prosecution if the...

Read more →