The U.S. Constitution
Archival records, profiles, and educational resources since 1995.

Tillis Calls Noem’s DHS Leadership a “Disaster”
Oversight hearings are supposed to be boring. That is the point. In a healthy system, the drama lives outside the committee room, and inside you get the unglamorous work of answers, records, and measurable performance. Sometimes, though, the dullness breaks. In a Senate hearing, Sen. Thom Tillis...
Read more →
Supreme Court Weighs Geofence Warrants
When the Fourth Amendment was ratified in 1791, the idea that a private company could quietly keep a minute-by-minute record of where millions of people go would have sounded like fantasy. Today, that kind of location history is routine. And the Supreme Court is now being asked a very practical...
Read more →
Are Connected Cars Becoming Rolling Surveillance Devices?
For decades, your car mostly revealed what could be seen from the outside: where it was parked, whether it was speeding, maybe what was in plain view through a window. Today, many vehicles are something else entirely: networked computers with sensors, software, and cellular connections that can...
Read more →
Your Car’s Data and the Fourth Amendment
You can close your garage door, buckle your seatbelt, and still leave a trail. Not tire tracks. Data. Lawmakers are pressing for tighter limits on connected-car data after privacy advocates warned that modern vehicles can collect location, speed, route history, braking patterns, voice commands,...
Read more →
Your Car as a Surveillance Device
Your car used to be a private bubble with a steering wheel. Now it is a sensor package on wheels, and the fight in Washington is no longer just about what automakers can collect. It is also about whether federal agencies, state investigators, or government contractors can obtain that data, or in...
Read more →
Your Car’s Data and the Fourth Amendment
For much of American history, the government often had to rely on physical surveillance, human sources, or scattered records to learn where you went. Today, your own vehicle may be quietly building a record instead. In Washington, lawmakers including Sen. Ron Wyden and Sen. Ed Markey have pressed...
Read more →
The FCC’s News Distortion Trap
There is a specific kind of power in American government that does not look like censorship at first glance. It does not confiscate printing presses. It does not ban a book. It does not even need to win a defamation case in court. It simply reminds a speaker: your permission to operate can be...
Read more →
Chip Roy Urges HHS to Suspend Funding for CAIR
Federal funding decisions can feel abstract until a lawmaker tries to tie them to a single, sharp claim: taxpayer money, Rep. Chip Roy argues, should not flow to organizations he says facilitate terrorism. In a letter sent Monday to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Roy...
Read more →
When the White House Jokes About ‘No Kings’
A royal visit is always a little surreal in Washington. It invites a republic to admire the optics it claims to reject. That tension shows up whenever American politics brushes against crowns, carriage-processions, and the theater of inherited authority. The question is not whether the United...
Read more →
A ‘Military-Grade Weapons’ Ban After WHCD: The Second Amendment Fight Over Definitions
In the days after the shooting connected to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, a familiar policy idea resurfaced quickly: ban “military-grade weapons.” That call was amplified by Pennsylvania state Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta, a former Democratic Party vice chair, who urged such a ban in a...
Read more →
GOP Section 702 Deal Hits Rules Committee Hurdle
A House Republican deal to renew and revise Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is hitting its first major procedural hurdle: the House Rules Committee. The committee decides what reaches the floor, how debate is structured, and which amendments are allowed. Lawmakers expected...
Read more →
When Politics Feels Like a Dead End
When an armed person rushes a high-profile political event, our first reaction is usually a mix of fear and disbelief. The second reaction, if we are honest, is often to reach for a simple explanation: “He was crazy,” or “He was evil,” or “That is just what politics is now.” Those...
Read more →
Geofence Warrants and the Fourth Amendment
There is a particular kind of search the Fourth Amendment was written to stop: the kind that begins with a dragnet and ends by deciding who looks suspicious. In 1791, that dragnet looked like a “general warrant,” a government permission slip to rummage through private papers without naming the...
Read more →
When Protest Feels Pointless
There is a particular kind of political despair that does not look like quiet resignation. It looks like acceleration. It looks like a person deciding that the ordinary channels of democracy are not just slow, but fake. That the doors marked petition , vote , and litigate are props on a stage, not...
Read more →
Supreme Court Weighs Limits on Roundup Mass Lawsuits
The Supreme Court is considering a question that comes up again and again in modern product litigation: when a product is regulated at the federal level, how much room is left for state lawsuits claiming the warnings were not strong enough? This time, the product is Roundup, a widely used weed...
Read more →
The Armed Man at the WHCA, and the Constitution We Practice
There is a particular kind of national anxiety that settles in when someone armed rushes a room full of public officials and journalists. It is not just fear of violence. It is the realization that our civic life depends on fragile rituals: public events, open access, a free press standing close...
Read more →
Jurisdiction Stripping and the Courts
Every few years, Congress rediscovers a tempting lever: if courts keep striking down our laws, why not keep courts from hearing the cases at all? That idea has a name: jurisdiction stripping . It sounds technical, but it is one of the most direct ways the political branches can try to change...
Read more →
Humanitarian Parole vs. Advance Parole
In everyday English, “parole” sounds like something you get after serving time. In immigration law, it means something very different, and much more precarious. Immigration parole is a discretionary permission to be in the United States for a limited period and a specific purpose, without being...
Read more →
Presidential Signing Statements
The president signs a bill. Cameras click. Pens multiply. And then, sometimes, the president adds a few paragraphs that sound like a footnote to the law itself. That footnote is a presidential signing statement , and it is one of the most misunderstood tools in the executive branch. Some people...
Read more →
The Insanity Defense
People talk about the insanity defense like it is a magic phrase: say it, and the courtroom door swings open. In reality, it is among the narrowest, most technical defenses in American criminal law, and it answers a very specific question. Not whether the defendant did the act. Not whether the...
Read more →