The U.S. Constitution
Archival records, profiles, and educational resources since 1995.

Trump Removes Attorney General Pam Bondi, Names Todd Blanche Acting AG
President Donald Trump announced Thursday that Attorney General Pam Bondi is leaving the Justice Department, a sudden shakeup that places Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the role of acting attorney general. Trump framed the change as a transition, writing that Bondi would be moving to “a...
Read more →
Trump, Bondi, and the DOJ: What a Leadership Swap Means for Your Rights
When people ask whether the Justice Department is “independent,” I usually answer with a question: independent from whom ? The Constitution does not create an independent Justice Department. It creates a President who must “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” The DOJ is part of...
Read more →
Trump Officials Born to Immigrant Parents
When people debate birthright citizenship , the conversation can feel abstract, like a courtroom exercise about commas and clauses. But the Constitution’s promise of citizenship at birth has always had a very practical side: it determines who is recognized as an American from day one, including...
Read more →
Pam Bondi Fired as Attorney General
Attorney General Pam Bondi has been fired by President Donald Trump, a jarring reminder that in the modern presidency, the Justice Department can become both a legal institution and a political mirror. The White House has confirmed that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche will step in as acting...
Read more →
Judge Blocks Trump Order Targeting NPR and PBS Funding
For years, Americans have argued about whether public broadcasting deserves taxpayer support. That is a policy fight. On March 31, a federal court said the Trump White House tried to turn it into something else entirely: a constitutional violation. In a ruling that goes straight to the First...
Read more →
Judge Halts White House Ballroom Until Congress Authorizes Funding
A federal judge has ordered construction on the proposed White House ballroom to pause unless and until Congress authorizes the project, turning a high-profile renovation fight into a civics lesson about who controls federal building decisions and, more importantly, federal dollars. The order...
Read more →
Hegseth Lifts Suspension of Army Pilots After Kid Rock Flyover
A brief military spectacle outside a celebrity’s home turned into a small but revealing lesson in how the armed forces balance discipline, judgment, and public perception. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that the Army pilots who carried out a helicopter fly-by near musician Kid Rock’s...
Read more →
The Noem Story and the Constitution’s Blackmail Problem
There are two separate stories wrapped inside the recent revelations about Bryon Noem, the husband of former homeland security secretary Kristi Noem. The first is tabloid fodder: private photos, explicit messages, and a months-long online fetish exchange that reportedly involved cross-dressing...
Read more →
Amicus Briefs: When Outside Groups Weigh In
You have probably seen the headline version of this: a major case hits the Supreme Court and suddenly a flood of outside groups “weigh in.” States. Trade associations. Civil rights organizations. Retired judges. Sometimes even members of Congress. Those filings are usually amicus briefs , short...
Read more →
Mistrials and Hung Juries
A criminal trial is supposed to end with a verdict. Guilty or not guilty. A clean, final answer. But sometimes the system cannot get there. Jurors cannot agree. Something happens in the courtroom that makes a fair verdict impossible. The judge declares a mistrial , and the case hits an unsettling...
Read more →
The Senate Blue Slip, Explained
Some of the most consequential power in Washington lives in places you will not find in the Constitution’s text. The Senate “blue slip” is one of those places. It is not a law. It is not a constitutional requirement. It is a Senate Judiciary Committee tradition that can slow, reshape, or stop...
Read more →
Unanimous Consent in the Senate
The Senate has 100 members, debate can be extended on many questions, and it has a reputation for procedural gridlock in practice. Yet most days, it still manages to move quickly through stacks of routine work. The tool that makes that possible is unanimous consent , usually shortened to UC . UC is...
Read more →
What Is a Special Counsel?
Americans tend to talk about “the DOJ” as if it is a single, unified person with one set of motives. In reality, it is a sprawling bureaucracy with thousands of attorneys, layered supervision, and a basic institutional goal: to make prosecutorial decisions that can survive scrutiny from bosses,...
Read more →
Senatorial Holds Explained
The Senate is built partly around a polite fiction: that it runs on cooperation. Most days, it does. Many noncontroversial measures move by unanimous consent, many nominations get cleared in batches, and the chamber can move faster than its reputation suggests. Then one senator decides to slow...
Read more →
Court Gag Orders Explained
A gag order is one of the stranger things an American court can do in public: tell people involved in a case to stop talking about it. It sounds like censorship, and sometimes it functions that way. But it is also a courtroom management tool, aimed at protecting a defendant’s right to a fair...
Read more →
Criminal Indictment vs Information vs Charge
You can be told you are “charged with a crime” in several different ways, by different actors, at different moments in a case. That is why the words indictment , information , complaint , and “ charge ” get used interchangeably in headlines, even though they do not mean the same thing. A...
Read more →
Congressional Subpoenas Explained
A congressional subpoena is one of the sharpest tools Congress has for getting information it believes it needs to legislate, oversee the executive branch, or investigate public problems. It can look like a court subpoena. It can feel like a criminal investigation. But constitutionally and...
Read more →
The Speech and Debate Clause
Members of Congress say controversial things for a living. Sometimes they say them in hearings, sometimes on the House floor, sometimes in a committee report that lands hard in the news cycle. So here is the natural question, especially when subpoenas start flying and prosecutors start asking...
Read more →
Contempt of Court Explained
“Contempt of court” sounds like a judge punishing someone for being rude. Sometimes it is about behavior. Often, it is about enforcement: the court’s ability to make its orders mean something in the real world. And before we go further, a quick but important separation. Contempt of court is a...
Read more →
Congressional Censure Explained
Congress can do something that feels like punishment without ever touching a person’s job title: it can formally condemn a member in the name of the institution itself. That is censure. It is not a criminal sentence. It is not impeachment. It is not, strictly speaking, a removal tool. It is...
Read more →