The U.S. Constitution

Should Candidates Be Allowed to Bet on Their Own Elections?

Here is a civics-class question that should make every voter a little uncomfortable: if a candidate can legally raise money, buy ads, hire staff, and shape the message, why should it feel different when that same candidate puts cash on the outcome of their own election? Because it is different. Not...

Federal Court Halts Arkansas Act 900 in NetChoice Challenge

Arkansas tried, once again, to reshape how social media works for young people. And once again, a federal court stepped in. In NetChoice LLC v. Griffin , a judge in the Western District of Arkansas issued a preliminary injunction against Arkansas Act 900 of 2025, concluding that major parts of the...

How Much Power Should an Attorney General Use to Reshape Gun Enforcement?

When Americans talk about “gun policy,” they often picture Congress passing a law. But a large share of day-to-day Second Amendment enforcement flows through the Department of Justice and its sub-agency, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). That reality is at the...

Supreme Court to Hear Green Card Case on Charges

For many families, a green card represents stability: the ability to live and work in the United States on a long-term basis and to build a life with fewer immigration uncertainties. But lawful permanent residence is not the same as citizenship. One major difference is that the federal government...

The SEC Settlement Gag Rule and the First Amendment

When most people think about the First Amendment, they picture a public square, a protest sign, or a newspaper editorial. But some of the most consequential speech questions happen in quieter places, like the fine print of a settlement agreement. That is the heart of the dispute over the SEC’s...

When the Court Leaks

For most of American history, the Supreme Court has asked the public for patience. Read the opinions, follow the reasoning, accept the result, even if you hate it. That bargain is not written into the Constitution, but it is the cultural glue that has kept nine unelected lawyers from looking like...

Virginia Democrats’ referendum would rewrite redistricting rules for a 10–1 map

Virginia is holding a rare kind of election with national consequences: a statewide referendum that would change the rules for drawing congressional districts and immediately swap in a new set of lines that could reshape who represents the Commonwealth in the U.S. House. The proposed map is not...

Tariffs and the Courts

Tariffs are often framed in politics as easy to announce and, depending on context, harder to defend. Supporters may describe them as a show of strength or bargaining leverage. Critics may describe them as a broad cost increase that can feel tax-like in practice. Once tariffs are challenged, the...

SCOTUS to Weigh Funding for Schools That Reject Same-Sex Parents

The Supreme Court just agreed Monday to hear a case that sounds, on the surface, like a narrow fight over preschool paperwork. It is not narrow. It is a live question about what Americans mean when we say “religious liberty,” and what we mean when we say equal access, even when the legal fight...

Tariffs After a Court Ruling

TL;DR: Congress holds the Constitution’s core tariff power, but it has given presidents several statutory tools to act in defined circumstances. Courts typically police the boundaries of those statutes. In scenarios where a court narrows one statutory pathway, disputes often shift to which...

Who Owns Presidential Records?

In everyday life, we assume the person who writes an email or takes a note “owns” it. The presidency does not work that way. When a president and the White House staff create documents while carrying out public duties, those materials are generally treated as public records , preserved for...

The Tariff Refund Portal Is Live. Don’t Expect a Check in Your Mailbox.

When the Supreme Court struck down the Trump administration’s emergency tariffs earlier this year, a lot of Americans heard one simple idea: those tariffs are gone, so the government has to give the money back . True, as far as it goes. But the more uncomfortable civics question is this: who...

Supreme Court to Weigh Colorado’s Pre-K Rules and Catholic Schools

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a Colorado dispute that sits at a familiar constitutional crossroads: when a state offers public benefits to private groups, how far can it go in setting the terms without crossing the First Amendment’s protections for religious exercise? The case arises from...

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) Explained

You can sue many people and entities in American court. A company. A neighbor. A city. Sometimes even the federal government, but only where Congress has clearly waived immunity. A foreign country is different. Not because it is too powerful to be sued, but because the United States has decided, as...

The Compact Clause and Interstate Deals

States are not supposed to behave like mini-countries. They cannot make treaties, coin money, or run foreign policy. But the Constitution also recognizes something more practical: sometimes states have to cooperate. They share rivers and ports. They run commuter rail systems that cross state lines....

The Legislative Veto and INS v. Chadha

Congress loves a shortcut. The Constitution does not. For much of the 20th century, one of Congress’s favorite shortcuts was the legislative veto , a device that let either one chamber, or sometimes even a committee, cancel an executive action without passing a new law. It felt efficient. It...

The Border Search Exception

You can memorize the Fourth Amendment in a minute. You can spend a lifetime learning the exceptions. The border search exception is one of the biggest. It is the doctrine that lets the government search people and property at the international border, and at its functional equivalents like...

Cooper v. Aaron and Supreme Court Supremacy

Most Supreme Court cases are remembered for a rule. Cooper v. Aaron is remembered for a warning. In 1958, Arkansas officials tried to slow-walk, outmaneuver, and ultimately evade school desegregation after Brown v. Board of Education . The Supreme Court responded with a rare, unanimous opinion....

The Byrd Rule and Reconciliation Bills

Budget reconciliation is often described like a cheat code: a fast-track tool that lets the Senate pass major fiscal legislation by simple majority vote under tight debate limits, so a filibuster cannot drag it out. In a 50-50 Senate, that “51” often means the vice president breaking a tie. The...

The False Claims Act and Qui Tam Lawsuits

Most government fraud is boring on purpose. It hides in the ordinary: a billing code entered twice, a box checked that should have been left blank, a contract requirement treated like a suggestion. And because federal spending is massive, the smallest lie can scale into a fortune. The False Claims...