In the vast machinery of the federal government, there are countless committees staffed by ordinary citizens who volunteer their time to improve its function. These panels are the essence of civic duty, operating far from the glare of partisan politics.
But a new directive from the Trump administration has cast a long shadow over one such group, revealing that no corner of the government is too obscure to be subjected to a political loyalty test.

Who Are the 75 Volunteers Now Under White House Scrutiny?
The target of this new scrutiny is the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, a 75-member committee of unpaid volunteers. Their job is mundane but crucial: they listen to public feedback and offer the IRS non-binding recommendations on how to make tax filing easier and less painful for American citizens. They have no policymaking power.
Despite this, the Treasury Department has abruptly suspended all of the panel’s public meetings.
The reason? The White House has ordered a new, top-to-bottom vetting of every single member. The panel’s work – including its annual report on taxpayer struggles – is now frozen indefinitely.

A Chilling Effect in Action
The directive has had an immediate and corrosive effect. At least two members of the panel are resigning rather than submit to what they see as a redundant and politically motivated investigation.
As one former member, who had already undergone extensive background checks, explained:
“I didn’t care to go through the additional vetting. I had to be fingerprinted. I gave them, I recall, permission to review my tax returns. There was a significant amount of vetting already.”
This is the predictable result of such a move. It discourages civic participation and sends a clear message that offering your time and expertise to the government may subject you to intrusive political inspection.

The Search for a Motive
Why has a volunteer committee dedicated to improving tax forms suddenly drawn the ire of the White House? The official reason is unclear, but one panel member pointed to a possible catalyst: a subcommittee recommendation from earlier this year.
The recommendation gently urged the IRS to “adhere to all regulatory and legal requirements when disclosing taxpayer information.” This mild suggestion came as the IRS was reportedly sharing data with immigration enforcement agencies.
Though the recommendation was “watered down” and ultimately died in a higher committee, even this faint whisper of oversight may have been enough to be perceived as disloyalty.
An Isolated Incident or a Systemic Purge?
This action against a little-known IRS panel cannot be viewed in a vacuum. It is part of a clear and consistent pattern. The Trump administration has similarly dismantled or sidelined expert advisory boards at the Centers for Disease Control and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, among others.
This is a quiet but deliberate war on apolitical expertise. It is a drive to ensure that every voice within the federal apparatus, no matter how small or advisory in nature, is politically aligned with the executive.
When the White House is concerned with the loyalty of volunteers who give advice on tax forms, it signals a desire for a level of political control that is fundamentally at odds with the principle of a non-partisan, functioning civil service.